Pappas and 189 other members of Congress urge HHS to withdraw Head Start rule
The New Hampshire Democrat and other lawmakers said in a letter that the proposed rule would strip most of Head Start's quality standards. Pappas' office said nearly one in 10 children now enrolled could lose eligibility.
U.S. Rep. Chris Pappas, D-N.H., joined 189 other members of Congress in calling on the Department of Health and Human Services to withdraw a proposed rule that the lawmakers said would remove more than 90% of Head Start's standards, his office said Friday.
Under the proposal, nearly one in 10 children now enrolled in Head Start could lose eligibility at once, according to Pappas' office. Pappas represents New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District.
In a letter, the lawmakers argued that the rule would illegally modify and weaken services required by the Head Start Act. They said it would eliminate federal quality standards for Head Start classrooms, including safety standards, staff-to-child ratios, staff qualifications and teaching standards, and would erode services the program provides to children and families, including health services. They also said it would shorten Head Start's operating hours, eliminate enrollment protections for children with disabilities and undermine services for dual language learners.
"This proposed rule is a brazen attempt to dismantle Head Start without regard for the hundreds of thousands of young children and working-class families who depend on these programs and services every year," the lawmakers wrote.
They said that under the proposal, Head Start children could be subject to corporal punishment, left unsupervised, placed in larger classes with less qualified teachers, and lose preventive and continuous health services, including oral and mental health care.
"We strongly urge you to withdraw the proposed rule, obey the law, and protect the legacy of Head Start," they wrote.
Pappas' office also accused HHS of repeatedly trying to undermine and disrupt Head Start during the second Trump administration, citing what it described as an aggressive deregulation agenda, illegally withheld funding, the firing of federal staff and threats to eliminate the program.
The release did not include a response from HHS.
This brief was drafted by AI from a public agency or political press release and published by The New England Signal. Why we use AI for stories like this one.