Vermont attorney general and 20 others sue over Endangered Species Act rule changes
Attorney General Charity Clark said a coalition including Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island filed two lawsuits challenging federal rules that they say weaken habitat protections for threatened and endangered wildlife.
Vermont Attorney General Charity Clark and 20 other attorneys general filed two lawsuits Wednesday challenging federal rule changes that they say strip away habitat protections for threatened and endangered species.
One suit was filed against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the other against that agency and the National Marine Fisheries Service, according to Clark's office.
The first challenges the agencies' decision to rescind a longstanding regulatory definition of "harm" under the Endangered Species Act, which had included significant habitat modification or degradation that could kill or injure wildlife by disrupting breeding, feeding or sheltering. Removing that definition makes it easier for habitat to be damaged or destroyed, the coalition said.
The second suit challenges two Fish and Wildlife Service rules that the states said reduce protections for threatened species and create a new process for designating critical habitat. The coalition argues both sets of rules conflict with the Endangered Species Act, the Administrative Procedure Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.
Clark's office said several federally listed species live in Vermont, including the northern long-eared bat, the Indiana bat and the Canada lynx.
The attorneys general of Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island were among those joining the filings, along with 17 other states and the District of Columbia.
The federal agencies have not responded to the claims in court.
This brief was drafted by AI from a public agency press release and published by The New England Signal. Why we use AI for stories like this one.